HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Honda CR-V vs Nissan Rogue
Honda CR-V
1997–2026 · suv
Nissan Rogue
2008–2026 · suv
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Every metric is normalized per model year so a long-running nameplate isn't unfairly penalized against a newer rival. The greener cell wins each row.
| Metric | CR-V | Rogue |
|---|---|---|
Defect & Recall Risk Higher is better | 61/100✓ | 51/100 |
Best Year Buyer Score Higher is better | 72/100 (2022)✓ | 67/100 (2020) |
Recalls per Year Lower is better | 1.8✓ | 2.7 |
Complaints per Year Lower is better | 515 | 291.2✓ |
Injuries + Deaths / Year Lower is better | 19.8 | 16.2✓ |
Crash-Involved Complaints Lower is better | 5.1%✓ | 6.6% |
| Categories won | 4 | 2 |
Best Year to Buy — Each Model
Most-Reported Problems
Complaint counts across all model years, from NHTSA owner filings. Frequency indicates how often an area is reported, not severity.
The Bottom Line
On the data, the Honda CR-V is the safer used-car bet, winning 4 of 6 categories. It carries a 61/100 Reliability Index versus 51/100 for the Nissan Rogue, and averages 1.8 recalls and 515.0 complaints per model year (vs 2.7 and 291.2). Whichever you choose, run the specific VIN — a single car's accident and title history can outweigh the model-level averages.
This compares models. A VIN report shows the individual vehicle — accidents, odometer history, open recalls, and auction records.